Home Add to Favorite Contact Submit  
             25 November, 2020
 

    
Category:  Articles » Reference & Education » Legal

 

Covert recordings of Disciplinary Meetings with an Employer

Popularity:
         Views: 1303
2007-03-07 06:48:26     
Article by Ian Mann

In the recent case of Chairman and Governors of Amweil View School v Mrs C Dogherty UKEAT/0243/06/DA, Mrs. Dogherty who was a teaching assistant at the Amweil View School, covertly recorded her disciplinary hearings and even the private deliberations of her employers who were considering her future employment. This article examines the state of the law on the use of covert recordings as evidence in the employment tribunal of an employer's conduct.

Use of covert recordings

Dogherty was dismissed for misconduct through the use of unreasonable force and inappropriate language in relation to some children. She relied upon her covert recordings to support her claim for unfair dismissal in the employment tribunal because she disputed the minutes of the open hearing of the disciplinary and appeal hearings produced by the school. She applied rather late in the day to have the evidence of her covert recordings admitted. The employment tribunal, by a case management order, allowed her to use the unauthorized recordings she had made of the disciplinary and appeal panel hearings, including the private deliberations. In other words, even though the employer did not know that the meeting nor the private deliberations were being recorded, that evidence could be used in the tribunal.

Appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The school appealed against the Order. It argued that Dogherty's clandestine recording of the deliberations of members of disciplinary and appeal panels amounted to an unjustified infringement of the governors' right to privacy, and that the public interest required those deliberations to remain private. Dogherty invoked her right to rely on the disputed evidence and to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Applying XXX v YYY [2004] IRLR 471 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that "the first and most important rule of the law of evidence...is that evidence is only admissible if it indeed is relevant to an issue between the parties." It had no hesitation in upholding the tribunal's finding that the material contained in the recordings was relevant to Dogherty's unfair dismissal claim.

A majority of the EAT was satisfied that the decision taken by the ET was within the range of responses that a reasonable tribunal might make and refused to interfere in the absence of any questions of law-Barracks v Coles (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2006] EWCA Civ 1041 applied. Further, it was held, according to the overriding objective in the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1861) the tribunal could do justice by admitting the evidence, giving the school a full opportunity to consider it, and by penalising Dogherty in costs for disclosing the evidence late.

The school argued that to admit the disputed evidence would involve the ET itself infringing the human rights of the governors who were members of the relevant panels. However, the EAT rejected that what had occurred could possibly amount to the interference of the governors' right to respect for family life because the relationship between a governor and a member of their family was not "touched at all" by admission of the evidence in question.

The school submitted that there would be an interference with the governors' private lives because their privacy would be invaded if their observations, during the private deliberations or the open hearings which were conducted in the absence of the public, reached the public domain. However, the EAT held that each of the panel members had put themselves forward to carry out an aspect of the important voluntary work undertaken by many individual members of the public in the governance of schools. As such, the privacy element of the right to respect for private life of such a school governor was not engaged. In any event, the EAT relied on Jones v University of Warwick [2003] EWCA Civ 151, which held that a court may properly admit relevant evidence even where it has been gathered in breach of an Art 8 right to privacy where to do so was considered necessary to secure a fair hearing.

The school argued that the recordings were made clandestinely. However, the EAT noted that there was no breach of the contract of employment. Concerning the open hearings, the EAT upheld the Tribunal's decision to admit the evidence as it was always intended that there would be at least one written record of the open hearings in the minutes drawn up by the clerk of the school.

In relation to the private deliberations, the EAT held that Dogherty could not adduce such evidence in support of her claim. The EAT took into account the fact that the panel members had invited all parties and witnesses before them to withdraw so that they might deliberate privately and Dogherty and her representative accepted that invitation. Likewise, those participating in the deliberations would have done so on the premise that no one would then disclose or publish what had occurred during the private deliberations.

However, the private deliberations might become admissible where, for example, the decision was taken by a panel which gave no reasons for its decision, and the inadvertent recording of private deliberations had produced evidence of some sort of discrimination (see BNP Paribas v Mezzotero [2004] IRLR 508).

Conclusion

Although this factual scenario is new, the decision in this case is in fact not new law. It is based on established principles of the probity and cogency of evidence in the fair resolution of disputes where evidence is available. However, it is a salutary reminder to employers to conduct hearings fairly. It may also be a warning to them to consider including the prohibition of use of covert recording in contracts of employment and employment handbooks.

Specialized in: Employment Barrister - Employment Law - Age Discrimination - Barrister - Employment Lawyer - Employment Law Barrister - Dismissal - Dismissals - Barristers - Age Discrimination Law - Law - Ian Mann - 13 Kings Bench Walk
URL: http://www.employment-barrister-uk.com
Print article      Bookmark this page
Related Articles 
A Guide for Veterans Searching for a Highly Experienced Mesothelioma Lawyer (Popularity: ): U.S. veterans are at risk for developing mesothelioma. This is a condition resulting from exposure to asbestos. There are many other dangers associated with asbestos exposure, something that asbestos manufacturers did not reveal. In this short guide, you’ll learn more about this condition as well as how to choose the right mesothelioma attorney to help you file a claim or lawsuit.The Use of Asbestos by Branches of the United States ...
Typical Cases Handled by Accident Lawyers Pennsylvania (Popularity: ): Accidents are often caused owing to negligence or disregard for others’ safety. If you are a victim of such an accident, getting timely medical and legal help is of utmost importance. Accidents can be of many types. Sometimes, accidents that seem like minor ones could lead to serious physical damage and monetary losses. Accident lawyers Pennsylvania can help you deal with all the issues arising from an accident, especially one ...
How To Write Winning Law School Personal Statements (Popularity: ): After weighing academic performance, law schools are most interested in assembling a class of interesting people. In this sense, their criteria are broader than those used by business or medical schools, whose applicants face more clearly defined expectations. Unfortunately, law school applicants often find this freedom intimidating rather than encouraging.Too often writers resort to a safe route, and it should be obvious why such an approach would prevent them from ...
Things to Avoid While Filing Whiplash Claim Compensation Requests (Popularity: ): Most claimants are aware of the things that they need to do while filing a whiplash claim compensation request but many claimants are not aware of the few things that must not be done. This article will elaborate on a few things that can cause your whiplash claim compensation request to be denied immediately. Never admit liability. Although it may seem instinctive to apologize for the accident and claim liability, ...
How Credit Monitoring Can Avoid Identity Theft (Popularity: ): As you know, constantly monitoring your credit will help you avoid identity theft, in the sense that you will be able to catch the perpetrator before he does much damage. While you can check your credit report every year for free, this might not be enough to catch identity theft. Credit monitoring services that require monthly subscriptions will give you alerts via email, SMS, or standard mail about changes made ...


Related Business 
Covert Operations Program Specialists (TN) (Popularity: ): C.O.P.S. specializes in undercover and surveillance training for covert law enforcement officers.
Association of Clinical Pathologists ( United Kingdom ) (Popularity: ): A multi-disciplinary organization which promotes the study of pathology in Britain and provides services for members. Includes details of meetings and conferences.
Spy-Tronix Security Warehouse (Popularity: ): Spy-Tronix sells a wide range of security equipment to include covert voice recorders, covert security cameras, GPS Tracking devices and even personal protection products.
Commercial Recordings (Popularity: ): Manufacturer of church music recordings whose catalog includes a few recordings of change ringing.
Payrollen Payroll Company (Popularity: ): In payrollen payroll company is the legal employer W-Performance of your employees while at work remains the sole employer and have access to these employees. The payroll company has no involvement with the employee. You as an employer can use your own staff recruitment and selection.
Travis Software (Popularity: ): Provides benefit administration software, support, and training for the single employer, mid-sized employer, and third party administrator.
Atlanta Private Investigator (Popularity: ): We are a licensed investigation agency that conducts insurance investigations for our clients. Stryker provides our clients with a comprehensive battle-tested Workers' Compensation insurance defense program, focused on claims investigations. Service that include AOE/COE interviews, subrogation interviews and investigations, alive and well checks, activity checks, employer level investigation, statements and interviews, (SIU) anti-fraud program, covert and subrosa surveillance... and much more.
Ivy Creek Recordings and Publications (Popularity: ): Label featuring recordings of mountain music by authentic mountain musicians, with historical information. Online shopping for their recordings and videos, and contact details.
Polish Lawyer in London (Popularity: ): roubleshooting the agent and landlord, Polish lawyer in the London legal aid lawyer london london london legal advice divorce law firm in london uk problems at work, trouble with your employer for the recovery of civil law. Polish lawyer in the UK exemption, discrimination, and disciplinary dealings za?aleniowe each instance, the investigation of past employment claims (wages, vacation), violations of labor rights.
World's Earliest Television Recordings Restored (Popularity: ): Information on the recovery of the earliest recordings of television, describing the restoration of these recordings and their history.